不谋中国者不足以谋世界
No Global Empire Without China
中国商业投资政治风险评估方法和产品简介
China Business Security Risk Estimate:-Methodology & Contents
1 Our model for the China local political risk assessment has 5 indicator categories and 87 indicators. The 5 indicator groups are "local government & service capabilities," "economic and human developments," " corruption control," "judiciary institutions and efficiency," and "social safety."
2 Baseline scores are assigned to each province according to the values of the indicators.
3 After recent major risk events are weighed in, final scores are calculated for each province.
1 Our forecast report is based on two analysis models: social governance quality basic model and a crisis incident frequency model.
2 The basic model consists of five groups of indicators covering political and judiciary institutions, economic and financial health, human development, military and security effectiveness, and geopolitical environment. The incident model covers political,financial, social,cultural and international crisis events.
3 Baseline scores and event scores are balanced and weighed to provide final scores, indicating levels of crisis. The blue level means safe and the red level means crisis.
1The guide provides values of the indicators for political risk levels in China's 31 provinces and regions.
2 Our deep analysis of government-business relationships help provide our clients will practical guidance for those regulatory areas that are inconsisitant and non-transparent.
3 Detailed tips and advice concerning pitfalls and traps are povided to those seeking to do business. Useful and effective information is available for each region.
1 All main indicators for doing business in major cities and provinces.
2 Pitalls and traps linked to government-business relationships and tips for avoiding hidden risks of doing business in each province.
3 A list of regulatory areas that are most inconsistent and non-transparent, with tips on how to cope with various situations.
4 Case study and solution options for different risks.
1 Brief history and current situation regarding intellectual property protection in China.
2 Ways and means of forced technology transfer and theft in the China business world.
3 Effective strategies and tactics for fighting against those practices.
4 Ballancing good business collaboration and putting up a defense against forced transfers and thefts.
1 The truth about the China market access situation points to the difference between the central government policy and local reality.
2 The market access list of open industries and limited-access industries in provinces.
3 Non-tarrif and policy barriers.
4 Tips and tactics for overcoming these hidden barriers.
1 Due diligence investigation for clients of targeted companies and organizations in China.
2 Focus on management quality and compliance, and risk control schemes.
3 The true pictures of company's competitiveness and risk exposure.
4 Options and sugestions.
中国地方政治安全风险评估方法
Our Methodology
中国政治事件、监管和政策变化与
汇率、股市走势及行业发展之相互关系分析与预测
Correlation Analysis Between China's Politics,Regulations, Policies and Currency Movements, Stock Market and Industrial Development
1 根据我们的中国社会治理趋势分析模型，以官方统计数据和披露的事实为基础做出判断，不作抽象理论逻辑分析。
2 我们的中国社会治理趋势分析预测模型 分为基础分析模型和事件分析模型。基础分析模型包括五组指标：a.政治司法体系指标，b. 社会经济金融指标，c. 人文发展指标，d. 国家机器效能指标，e.国际地缘环境指标。事件分析模型包括六组危机型事件指标：政治军事，经济金融，社会群体，国内安全和地缘国际。
3 根据官方统计数据和事实给出基础分数和事件分数，再对两个分数进行权重平衡，然后给出最后的趋势预测分数。预测分数的等级分为蓝色、绿色、黄色、橙色和红色，其中蓝色最安全，红色最危险。
4 在综合分析做出结论判断后，根据客户具体需求，提出对策和建议。有效期六个月。
1 我们独创的中国地方政治安全与社会治理模式来评估目标省区或地方的政治安全风险等级。
2 我们的分析模式包含5组指标，这5组指标是：政府治理与服务能力组，其中包括23个具体指标；社会经济及人文发展组，包含35个指标；腐败控制组，包含5个指标；司法系统公正与效能组，包含13个指标；社会安全组，包含11个指标。
4 所有指标的具体数值都是来源于国家统计局和各省市地方统计局最新的官方数据。
5根据这5组指标得出的基本风险分数，再加上该省区最近发生的相关领域的重大事件给予加分或减分。正面事件加分，负面事件减分。
6最后经过综合权衡和分析，得出该地区政治安全风险的最终分数。
7每半年更新一次数据和分值。
中国地方投资安全风险评估指南—聚焦政策和监管变化和透明度
Guide to China Local Political Risk With Focus on Policy and Regulatory Inconsistency and Intransparency
中国各地方营商环境特色和风险手册
Handbook for Local Conditions for Doing Business in China, With Advice & Tips for Avoiding Traps and Tricks
中国股市上市公司政策和监管风险之地雷的评估和咨询服务
Advisory Services and Reports on Policy and Regulatory Risks and Traps in Chinese A-Share Listed Companies
中国地方市场准入指南：各种非关税壁垒的陷阱和招数
Guide to China Local Market Access
Traps and Pitfalls of Non-Tariff Barriers
对客户指定的目标公司和组织进行风险尽职调查
Due Diligence on Targeted Organizations and Companies for Clients
1 Use our unique models and data bank to spot and estimate landmines and red flags in Chinese A-share listed companies.
2 Our analysis goes through a three- stage process to produce convincing results for our clients.
3 We Offer investment advice and solutions to avoid possible investment losses.
中国知识产权保护：如何防止强迫转让和盗取技术实用指南
Practical Guide to Intellectual Property Protection in China With Effective Means of Avoiding Forced Technology Transfer and Theft
1 指南给出每个省区的具体政治安全风险指标水平，使客户对该地区的风险情况一目了然。
2 聚焦每个省区的政商关系，给客户描绘出一个清晰的政策环境，特别是针对那些政策特别容易变化的领域和不透明情况做出具体的分析和建议。
3 给出客户实用有效的建议和对策，避免同政府部门打交道时容易出现的陷阱和漏洞。
1 各省区主要城市营商环境指标状况和特点；
2 各省区政商关系特点及实用细节；
3 各省区主要易变政策和主要不透明领域风险点及具体分析；
4 具体应对策略和建议解决方案。
1 中国知识产权保护基本历史和现状；
2 商业实践中强迫技术转让的具体形式和特点；
3 技术盗取分布的主要行业和方式；
4 应对强迫技术转让的有效对策和方法；
5 反技术盗取的实用对策和方法；
6 如何避免在中国商场上应对强迫技术转让和盗取的陷阱，寻找平衡点。
1 为客户进行指定目标公司或组织的尽职调查。
2 目标公司管理层的主要负责人及其决策思维特点。公司决策体制及风控及合规状况。
3 公司财务真实状况和风险点所在。
4 公司业务在行业的地位和竞争力实力。
5 公司与政府关系实际情况和问题。
6 公司业务发展前景和主要风险。
7 建议和对策。
1 中国市场准入真实状况；中央和地方的一致与不一致。
2 各省区行业市场准入清单：受欢迎的和不受欢迎的投资，政策性限制。
3 市场准入的各种非政策性限制：各种壁垒招数和特点，防不胜防。
4 如何打破政策性和非政策行壁垒.
5 对策和建议。
1 运用我们的分析模型和数据库识别和评估A股上市公司中涉及政策和监管风险的地雷。
2 通过三阶段模型评估，以数据事实说话，为客户提供确定的结果和判断。
4 提出避免损失的投资建议和解决方案。
1 Provinces are ranked according to their scores, which were calculated by values of 5 indicators for anti-corruption institutional efficiency, the official property disclosure system, major corruption case numbers and corrupt official on trial numbers.
2 Corrupt official numbers are key indicators, as every corrupt official represents a number of officials who are involved in his network of curruption.
3 All numbers in the past five years come from the annual work reports of provincial high courts and procuratorates.
4 This ranking is valid for 2026 and will be updated every year.
1 Provinces are ranked according to their scores, which are produced by weighing in values of more than 80 indicators in five categories.
2 All data come from the State Statistics Bureau and local government data departments.
3 The final scores incorporat major positive and negative incidents in current statistical periods.
4 This ranking was valid for the year 2026 and is updated every year.
1 Provinces are ranked by the total scores, which are calculated by weighing in all factors and values of 25 indicators in four categories such as political institutions,social governance, administrative management,decision making processes, policy information disclosure systems and government's basic public service capabilities.
2 All data used in indicator values come from the egovernment research center under the National Academy of Governance, official statistics bureaus and government websites.
3 This ranking was valid for the year 2026 and will be updated every year.
1 Provinces are ranked in accordance with their scores, which are calculated by weighing in values of 35 indicators in five indicator categories such as economic, social and human development, social security and the ecological system.
2 All data used in indicator values come from the State Statistics Bureau and local government data departments.
3 This ranking was valid for the year 2026 and is updated every year.
”社会治理政治安全风险最大省区排行榜“说明
1 省区综合得分是根据5组80多项具体指标的分值进行权重综合后结果。满分100。
2 各项指标数据来源于国家统计局和各省区经济社会统计公报数据。
3 综合得分最终分值还包括该省区相关领域里统计时间内发生的重大事件，正相关事件 加分，负相关事件减分。
4 此排行榜有效期为2026年。
经济社会人文综合发展最落后省区排行榜说明
1 各省区得分是根据该地区经济、社会、人文发展、社会保障和生态保护五个方面35相具体指标得分及综合权衡做出。满分35。
2 所有指标数据来源是国家统计局和地方经济社会发展统计公报。
3 该排行榜有效期为2026年。
腐败形势最严峻省区排行榜说明
1 最后得分是根据地方纪检监察机构效能、官员财产公开、大案要案查处数量、处级以上官员查处数量和社会腐败印象五方面的数据和事实综合权衡所得。满分10。
2 查处的贪腐官员上下游都有一串关系网和受益人，所以查出来的只是他们周围腐败人群的代表，自然也能折射出该地区的整体腐败状况。
3 数据和事实来源于“两高”和地方“两院”的年度工作报告。查处的案件和官员数量是按过去五年计算的。
4 该排行榜有效期为2026年。
省区政府服务与治理能力排行榜说明
1 根据政府体制运行和社会治理效力、行政管理和决策效率、政务信息公开、政府基本公共服务能力五个方面23相具体指标数值和重大相关事件综合权衡得出每个地方的最后分数。满分50。
2 各项指标数据来自国家行政学院电子政务研究中心、各省区省级政府政务官网和各省区统计局相关官方统计数字。
3 排行榜有效期为2026年。
